Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena
Scientific paper
2009-07-09
Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc.405:1458,2010
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena
16 pages, 10 figures, minor revisions, accepted for publication in MNRAS
Scientific paper
We present a critical analysis of the observational constraints on, and of the theoretical modeling of, aspects of cosmic ray (CR) generation and propagation in the Galaxy, which are relevant for the interpretation of recent positron and anti-proton measurements. We give simple, analytic, model independent expressions for the secondary pbar flux, and an upper limit for the secondary e+ flux, obtained by neglecting e+ radiative losses, e+/(e+ + e-)<0.2\pm0.1 up to ~300 GeV. These expressions are completely determined by the rigidity dependent grammage, which is measured from stable CR secondaries up to ~150 GeV/nuc, and by nuclear cross sections measured in the laboratory. pbar and e+ measurements, available up to ~100 GeV, are consistent with these estimates, implying that there is no need for new, non-secondary, pbar or e+ sources. The radiative loss suppression factor f_{s,e+} of the e+ flux depends on the e+ propagation in the Galaxy, which is not understood theoretically. A rough, model independent estimate of f_{s,e+} 1/3 can be obtained at a single energy, E\sim20 GeV, from unstable secondary decay and is found to be consistent with e+ measurements, including the positron fraction measured by PAMELA. We show that specific detailed models, that agree with compositional CR data, agree with our simple expressions for the e+ and pbar flux, and that the claims that the positron fraction measured by PAMELA requires new primary e+ sources are based on assumptions, that are not supported by observations. If PAMELA results are correct, they suggest that f_{s,e+} is slightly increasing with energy, which provides an interesting constraint on CR propagation models. We argue that measurements of the e+ to pbar ratio are more useful for challenging secondary production models than the positron fraction.
Blum Kfir
Katz Boaz
Morag Jonathan
Waxman Eli
No associations
LandOfFree
What can we really learn from positron flux 'anomalies'? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with What can we really learn from positron flux 'anomalies'?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and What can we really learn from positron flux 'anomalies'? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-163566