Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
Jul 1983
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1983apj...270...48w&link_type=abstract
Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 270, July 1, 1983, p. 48-50.
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
2
Cosmology, Quasars, Space Density, Evolution (Development), Red Shift
Scientific paper
Hawkins and Stewart's interpretation of the results of the V/V(max) test for QSO samples is shown to be invalid. Their suggestion that the high values of V/V(max) at small redshifts result from the exclusion of nearby QSOs from the samples is examined quantitatively for the well-studied 3CR sample, and shown to have a negligible effect on the results. Their claim that the values of V/V(max) at larger redshifts indicate a uniform space density of QSOs is not true after an error in their calculations is corrected. Although the V/V(max) test is less sensitive to space density evolution at large redshifts, current results are in good agreement with the hypothesis that a single density evolution law describes the observations out to a redshift of at least 2.5.
No associations
LandOfFree
The V/V(max) test for QSOs - Comments on the paper by Hawkins and Stewart does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The V/V(max) test for QSOs - Comments on the paper by Hawkins and Stewart, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The V/V(max) test for QSOs - Comments on the paper by Hawkins and Stewart will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1626966