Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2008-11-20
Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc.393:L65,2009
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
5 pages, 4 figures, MNRAS Letter (accepted)
Scientific paper
10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00601.x
We show how the observed gamma ray burst (GRB) optical afterglow (OA) and redshift distributions are changing in time from selection effects. For a subset of {\it Swift} triggered long duration bursts, we show that the mean time taken to acquire spectroscopic redshifts for a GRB OA has evolved to shorter times. We identify a strong correlation between the mean time taken to acquire a spectroscopic redshift and the measured redshift. This correlation reveals that shorter response times favour smaller redshift bursts. This is compelling evidence for a selection effect that biases longer response times with relatively brighter high redshift bursts. Conversely, for shorter response times, optically fainter bursts that are relatively closer are bright enough for spectroscopic redshifts to be acquired. This selection effect could explain why the average redshift, $
No associations
LandOfFree
GRB optical afterglow and redshift selection effects: The learning curve effect at work does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with GRB optical afterglow and redshift selection effects: The learning curve effect at work, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and GRB optical afterglow and redshift selection effects: The learning curve effect at work will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-162606