Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
Oct 2005
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2005a%26a...442...11f&link_type=abstract
Astronomy and Astrophysics, Volume 442, Issue 1, October IV 2005, pp.11-28
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
10
Line: Formation, Polarization, Magnetic Fields, Turbulence, Radiative Transfer
Scientific paper
This paper considers the effect of a random magnetic field on Zeeman line transfer, assuming that the scales of fluctuations of the random field are much smaller than photon mean free paths associated to the line formation (micro-turbulent limit). The mean absorption and anomalous dispersion coefficients are calculated for random fields with a given mean value, isotropic or anisotropic Gaussian distributions azimuthally invariant about the direction of the mean field. Following Domke & Pavlov (1979, Ap&SS, 66, 47), the averaging process is carried out in a reference frame defined by the direction of the mean field. The main steps are described in detail. They involve the writing of the Zeeman matrix in the polarization matrix representation of the radiation field and a rotation of the line of sight reference frame. Three types of fluctuations are considered : fluctuations along the direction of the mean field, fluctuations perpendicular to the mean field, and isotropic fluctuations. In each case, the averaging method is described in detail and fairly explicit expressions for the mean coefficients are established, most of which were given in Dolginov & Pavlov (1972, Soviet Ast., 16, 450) or Domke & Pavlov (1979, Ap&SS, 66, 47). They include the effect of a microturbulent velocity field with zero mean and a Gaussian distribution. A detailed numerical investigation of the mean coefficients illustrates the two effects of magnetic field fluctuations: broadening of the σ-components by fluctuations of the magnetic field intensity, leaving the π-components unchanged, and averaging over the angular dependence of the π and σ components. For longitudinal fluctuations only the first effect is at play. For isotropic and perpendicular fluctuations, angular averaging can modify the frequency profiles of the mean coefficients quite drastically with the appearance of an unpolarized central component in the diagonal absorption coefficient, even when the mean field is in direction of the line of sight. A detailed comparison of the effects of the three types of fluctuation coefficients is performed. In general the magnetic field fluctuations induce a broadening of the absorption and anomalous dispersion coefficients together with a decrease of their values. Two different regimes can be distinguished depending on whether the broadening is larger or smaller than the Zeeman shift by the mean magnetic field. For isotropic fluctuations, the mean coefficients can be expressed in terms of generalized Voigt and Faraday-Voigt functions H(n) and F(n) introduced by Dolginov & Pavlov (1972, Soviet Ast., 16, 450). These functions are related to the derivatives of the Voigt and Faraday-Voigt functions. A recursion relation is given in an Appendix for their calculation. A detailed analysis is carried out of the dependence of the mean coefficients on the intensity and direction of the mean magnetic field, on its root mean square fluctuations and on the Landé factor and damping parameter of the line.
Frisch Henry
Nagendra K. N.
Sampoorna M.
No associations
LandOfFree
Stochastic polarized line formation. I. Zeeman propagation matrix in a random magnetic field does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Stochastic polarized line formation. I. Zeeman propagation matrix in a random magnetic field, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Stochastic polarized line formation. I. Zeeman propagation matrix in a random magnetic field will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1617631