Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy
Scientific paper
Jan 2008
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2008apj...673l..99d&link_type=abstract
The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 673, Issue 1, pp. L99-L101.
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy
14
Sun: Activity, Sun: Magnetic Fields, Sun: Photosphere
Scientific paper
We show that the well-known ``Waldmeier effect,'' or anticorrelation between the peak in sunspot number of a cycle and the time from minimum to reach that peak, is not present in sunspot area data averaged in the same way. With a 13-rotation Gaussian running average applied to both sunspot number and sunspot area, we find the correlation between cycle rise time and cycle peak is r=-0.71 for sunspot number and r=10-4 for sunspot area. Hathaway et al. previously showed that the Waldmeier effect is much weaker (r=-0.34) in sunspot group number. Thus the Waldmeier effect may be specific to only Wolf sunspot number.
de Toma Giuliana
Dikpati Mausumi
Gilman Peter A.
No associations
LandOfFree
The Waldmeier Effect: An Artifact of the Definition of Wolf Sunspot Number? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The Waldmeier Effect: An Artifact of the Definition of Wolf Sunspot Number?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The Waldmeier Effect: An Artifact of the Definition of Wolf Sunspot Number? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1594230