The enigmatic WR46: A binary or a pulsator in disguise. III. Interpretation

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

18

Stars: Wolf-Rayet, Stars: Individual: Wr 46, Stars: Binaries: Close, Stars: Variables: General, Stars: Oscillations

Scientific paper

Photometric and spectroscopic monitoring campaigns of WR 46 (WN3p), as presented in Veen et al. (2002a,b; hereafter Papers I and II, respectively), yield the following results. The light- and colour variations reveal a dominant single-wave period of Psw89=0.1412 d in 1989, and Psw91 =0.1363 d in 1991. Because of a small difference in the minima, this periodicity may be a double-wave phenomenon (Pdw). The line fluxes vary in concert with the magnitudes. The significant difference of the periods can be either due to the occurence of two distinct periods, or due to a gradual change of the periodicity. A gradual brightening of the system of 0.12m appeared to accompany the period change. In addition, the light variations in 1989 show strong evidence for an additional period Px=0.2304 d. Generally, the radial velocities show a cyclic variability on a time scale of the photometric double-wave. However, often they do not vary at all. The observed variability confirms the Population I WR nature of the light source, as noted independently by Marchenko et al. (2000). In the present paper, we first show how the photometric double-wave variability can be interpreted as a rotating ellipsoidal density distribution in the stellar wind. Subsequently, we discuss what mechanisms could drive such a configuration. First, stellar rotation of a single star is discarded as a likely cause. Second, the obvious interpretation of the double-wave photometry, i.e., a close binary system, is investigated. However unlikely, we discuss how the observed period change might be reconciled within a model of a strongly interacting binary. Third, an interpretation of a non-radial multi-mode pulsator is investigated. The observed period change and the multi-frequency behaviour do support this interpretation. We propose that the pulsational mode l=1 and |m|=1 may mimic a ``binary'' light- and radial-velocity curve. However, the phasing of the radial velocity and the light curve may be inconsistent. The possibility l=2 and |m|=0 is also discussed. Finally, we suggest how the enigma of the variability of WR 46 may be solved.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

The enigmatic WR46: A binary or a pulsator in disguise. III. Interpretation does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with The enigmatic WR46: A binary or a pulsator in disguise. III. Interpretation, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The enigmatic WR46: A binary or a pulsator in disguise. III. Interpretation will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1533506

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.