Other
Scientific paper
Dec 2010
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2010agufm.p13d..03b&link_type=abstract
American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2010, abstract #P13D-03
Other
[5464] Planetary Sciences: Solid Surface Planets / Remote Sensing, [5470] Planetary Sciences: Solid Surface Planets / Surface Materials And Properties, [5480] Planetary Sciences: Solid Surface Planets / Volcanism, [6225] Planetary Sciences: Solar System Objects / Mars
Scientific paper
It is important to gain a clear understanding of basic physical properties of the upper martian crust. We can use these derived properties to test a range of plausible formation mechanisms and place constraints on the processes involved in the creation of the martian crust. Previous studies have addressed this problem using a variety of techniques and observations. It has been well-established that the martian upper crust is typically mechanically weak (e.g. Pike, 1980; Schultz, 2002; Stewart and Valiant, 2006) and the notion of a highly fractured mega-regolith has often been invoked as the cause of this weakness. There are apparent contradictions in the interpretations of separate observations, such as the fine-scale layering in canyon walls that would not be preserved in a mega-regolith (McEwen et al., 1999). In all cases, however, the original material that makes up either the layering or mega-regolith has been assumed to originate as effusive volcanic materials. We have re-examined the body of previous work in the light of more recent global thermophysical observations to place further constraints on the nature of the upper martian crust. Although the upper ~10 km of the crust is indeed mechanically weak, consistent with previous studies, these crustal materials are also inconsistent with a mega-regolith composed of fractured blocks. Thermal inertia derived from Thermal Emission Imaging System (THEMIS) data, High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) images, and Mars Exploration Rover observations clearly indicate that the upper martian crust is more typically composed of weakly consolidated fine-particulate materials. These materials are consistent with a volcaniclastic origin rather than effusive volcanism. Mechanically competent material akin to what might be derived from lava flows is clearly present on Mars in locations such as Hesperia Planum and at low latitudes within the northern lowlands, but it is much less common than has been assumed. It appears that Mars has a unique style of crustal formation that is distinct from that of the Moon and the other terrestrial planets. References: McEwen, A. S., and 14 colleagues (2007) Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter's High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE). J. Geophys. Res., 112, 10.1029/2005JE002605. Pike, R.J. (1980) Control of crater morphology by gravity and target type - Mars, earth, moon. Proc. Lun. Planet. Sci. Conf., 11, 2159-2189. Schultz, R. A. (2002) Stability of rock slopes in Valles Marineris, Mars. Geophys. Res. Let., 29, 10.1029/2002GL015728. Stewart, S. T. and G. J. Valiant (2006) Martian subsurface properties and crater formation processes inferred from fresh impact crater geometries. Meteor. Planet. Sci., 41, 1509-1537.
Bandfield Joshua L.
Edwards Christopher S.
Montgomery David R.
No associations
LandOfFree
Has Martian History Been Dominated by Explosive Rather than Effusive Volcanism? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Has Martian History Been Dominated by Explosive Rather than Effusive Volcanism?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Has Martian History Been Dominated by Explosive Rather than Effusive Volcanism? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1495047