Subsonic turbulence in smoothed particle hydrodynamics and moving-mesh simulations

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

22 pages, 20 figures, accepted in MNRAS. Includes a rebuttal to arXiv:1111.1255 of D. Price and significant revisions to addre

Scientific paper

Highly supersonic, compressible turbulence is thought to be of tantamount importance for star formation processes in the interstellar medium. Likewise, cosmic structure formation is expected to give rise to subsonic turbulence in the intergalactic medium, which may substantially modify the thermodynamic structure of gas in virialized dark matter halos and affect small-scale mixing processes in the gas. Numerical simulations have played a key role in characterizing the properties of astrophysical turbulence, but thus far systematic code comparisons have been restricted to the supersonic regime, leaving it unclear whether subsonic turbulence is faithfully represented by the numerical techniques commonly employed in astrophysics. Here we focus on comparing the accuracy of smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) and our new moving-mesh technique AREPO in simulations of driven subsonic turbulence. To make contact with previous results, we also analyze simulations of transsonic and highly supersonic turbulence. We find that the widely employed standard formulation of SPH yields problematic results in the subsonic regime. Instead of building up a Kolmogorov-like turbulent cascade, large-scale eddies are quickly damped close to the driving scale and decay into small-scale velocity noise. Reduced viscosity settings improve the situation, but the shape of the dissipation range differs compared with expectations for a Kolmogorov cascade. In contrast, our moving-mesh technique does yield power-law scaling laws for the power spectra of velocity, vorticity and density, consistent with expectations for fully developed isotropic turbulence. We show that large errors in SPH's gradient estimate and the associated subsonic velocity noise are ultimately responsible for producing inaccurate results in the subsonic regime. In contrast, SPH's performance is much better for supersonic turbulence. [Abridged]

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Subsonic turbulence in smoothed particle hydrodynamics and moving-mesh simulations does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Subsonic turbulence in smoothed particle hydrodynamics and moving-mesh simulations, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Subsonic turbulence in smoothed particle hydrodynamics and moving-mesh simulations will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-149164

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.