Keck constraints on a varying fine-structure constant: wavelength calibration errors

Details Keck constraints on a varying fine-structure constant: wavelength calibration errors Keck constraints on a varying fine-structure constant: wavelength calibration errors

Nov 2010

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2010hia....15..315m&link_type=abstract

Highlights of Astronomy, Volume 15, p. 315-315

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Astronomy

Instrumentation: Spectrographs – Techniques: Spectroscopic – Cosmology: Observations - Quasars: Absorption Lines – Line: Profiles

Scientific paper

The Keck telescope's High Resolution Spectrograph (HIRES) has previously provided evidence for a smaller fine-structure constant, α, compared to the current laboratory value, in a sample of 143 quasar absorption systems: Δα/α=(-0.57±0.11)×10-5. The analysis was based on a variety of metal-ion transitions which, if α varies, experience different relative velocity shifts. This result is yet to be robustly contradicted, or confirmed, by measurements on other telescopes and spectrographs; it remains crucial to do so. It is also important to consider new possible instrumental systematic effects which may explain the Keck/HIRES results. Griest et al. (2009) recently identified distortions in the echelle order wavelength scales of HIRES with typical amplitudes ±250 m s-1. Here we investigate the effect such distortions may have had on the Keck/HIRES varying α results. Using a simple model of these intra-order distortions, we demonstrate that they cause a random effect on Δα/α from absorber to absorber because the systems are at different redshifts, placing the relevant absorption lines at different positions in different echelle orders. The typical magnitude of the effect on Δα/α is ~0.4×10-5 for individual absorbers which, compared to the median error on Δα/α in the sample, ~1.9×10-5, is relatively small. Consequently, the weighted mean value changes by less than 0.05×10-5 if the corrections we calculate are applied. Unsurprisingly, with corrections this small, we do not find direct evidence that applying them is actually warranted. Nevertheless, we urge caution, particularly for analyses aiming to achieve high precision Δα/α measurements on individual systems or small samples, that a much more detailed understanding of such intra-order distortions and their dependence on observational parameters is important if they are to be avoided or modelled reliably.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Keck constraints on a varying fine-structure constant: wavelength calibration errors does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Keck constraints on a varying fine-structure constant: wavelength calibration errors, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Keck constraints on a varying fine-structure constant: wavelength calibration errors will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1484902