Mathematics – Logic
Scientific paper
Oct 2011
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2011epsc.conf.1247r&link_type=abstract
EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2011, held 2-7 October 2011 in Nantes, France. http://meetings.copernicus.org/epsc-dps2011, p.1247
Mathematics
Logic
Scientific paper
Earth-based color filter photography, first acquired in the 1960s, showed color differences related to morphologic boundaries on the Moon [1]. These color units were interpreted to indicate compositional differences, thought to be the result of variations in titanium content [1]. Later it was shown that iron abundance (FeO) also plays a dominant role in controlling color in lunar soils [2]. Equally important is the maturity of a lunar soil in terms of its reflectance properties (albedo and color) [3]. Maturity is a measure of the state of alteration of surface materials due to sputtering and high velocity micrometeorite impacts over time [3]. The Clementine (CL) spacecraft provided the first global and digital visible through infrared observations of the Moon [4]. This pioneering dataset allowed significant advances in our understanding of compositional (FeO and TiO2) and maturation differences across the Moon [5,6]. Later, the Lunar Prospector (LP) gamma ray and neutron experiments provided the first global, albeit low resolution, elemental maps [7]. Newly acquired Moon Mineralogic Mapper hyperspectral measurements are now providing the means to better characterize mineralogic variations on a global scale [8]. Our knowledge of ultraviolet color differences between geologic units is limited to low resolution (km scale) nearside telescopic observations, and high resolution Hubble Space Telescope images of three small areas [9], and laboratory analyses of lunar materials [10,11]. These previous studies detailed color differences in the UV (100 to 400 nm) related to composition and physical state. HST UV (250 nm) and visible (502 nm) color differences were found to correlate with TiO2, and were relatively insensitive to maturity effects seen in visible ratios (CL) [9]. These two results led to the conclusion that improvements in TiO2 estimation accuracy over existing methods may be possible through a simple UV/visible ratio [9]. The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) Wide Angle Camera (WAC) provides the first global lunar ultraviolet through visible (321 nm to 689 nm) multispectral observations [12]. The WAC is a sevencolor push-frame imager with nominal resolutions of 400 m (321, 360 nm) and 100 m (415, 566, 604, 643, 689 nm). Due to its wide field-of-view (60° in color mode) the phase angle within a single line varies ±30°, thus requiring the derivation of a precise photometric characterization [13] before any interpretations of lunar reflectance properties can be made. The current WAC photometric correction relies on multiple WAC observations of the same area over a broad range of phase angles and typically results in relative corrections good to a few percent [13].
Denevi Brett Wilcox
Hapke Bruce W.
Hawke Bernard Ray
Robinson Mark S.
Sato Haruo
No associations
LandOfFree
LROC WAC Ultraviolet Reflectance of the Moon does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with LROC WAC Ultraviolet Reflectance of the Moon, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and LROC WAC Ultraviolet Reflectance of the Moon will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1483398