Mathematics – Logic
Scientific paper
Oct 2011
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2011epsc.conf..153b&link_type=abstract
EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2011, held 2-7 October 2011 in Nantes, France. http://meetings.copernicus.org/epsc-dps2011, p.153
Mathematics
Logic
Scientific paper
This lack of periodicity is consistent with the prior implausibility of periodic mechanisms for comet or asteroid impacts, e.g. [2]. Although there is limited evidence that biodiversity variations show a periodic component, e.g. [9], one conclusion of my study is that bolide impacts cannot be responsible for this. More generally, the method developed in this study is a robust method which will be useful for modelling palaeontological variations of climate and biodiversity.
No associations
LandOfFree
Evidence for a variation - but no periodicity - in the terrestrial impact cratering rate does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Evidence for a variation - but no periodicity - in the terrestrial impact cratering rate, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Evidence for a variation - but no periodicity - in the terrestrial impact cratering rate will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1474743