Statistics
Scientific paper
Mar 1970
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1970natur.225..927w&link_type=abstract
Nature, Volume 225, Issue 5236, pp. 927-928 (1970).
Statistics
2
Scientific paper
RECENT work by Plagemann, Feldman and Gribbin1 seems to show that quasar redshifts are not intrinsic. I take no issue here with the more specific result of the Cambridge group, that there is no significant evidence for periodicity of peaks in the distribution of z (redshift). But, using the same observational material, which was taken from a list by Burbidge and Burbidge2, I find that the well known peak at z = 0.060 cannot be due to chance, although there is some uncertainty of the significance level. On the other hand, the conclusion of Burbidge3 that the peak at z = 1.95 is highly significant is not confirmed. It can be shown that the difference between our result and that of Burbidge is due to the interpretation of the statistics.
No associations
LandOfFree
Physical Sciences: How Significant are the Sharp Peaks in the Frequency Distribution of QSO Redshifts? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Physical Sciences: How Significant are the Sharp Peaks in the Frequency Distribution of QSO Redshifts?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Physical Sciences: How Significant are the Sharp Peaks in the Frequency Distribution of QSO Redshifts? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1453051