Physical Sciences: How Significant are the Sharp Peaks in the Frequency Distribution of QSO Redshifts?

Statistics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

2

Scientific paper

RECENT work by Plagemann, Feldman and Gribbin1 seems to show that quasar redshifts are not intrinsic. I take no issue here with the more specific result of the Cambridge group, that there is no significant evidence for periodicity of peaks in the distribution of z (redshift). But, using the same observational material, which was taken from a list by Burbidge and Burbidge2, I find that the well known peak at z = 0.060 cannot be due to chance, although there is some uncertainty of the significance level. On the other hand, the conclusion of Burbidge3 that the peak at z = 1.95 is highly significant is not confirmed. It can be shown that the difference between our result and that of Burbidge is due to the interpretation of the statistics.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Physical Sciences: How Significant are the Sharp Peaks in the Frequency Distribution of QSO Redshifts? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Physical Sciences: How Significant are the Sharp Peaks in the Frequency Distribution of QSO Redshifts?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Physical Sciences: How Significant are the Sharp Peaks in the Frequency Distribution of QSO Redshifts? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1453051

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.