Other
Scientific paper
Mar 1993
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1993lpi....24.1293s&link_type=abstract
In Lunar and Planetary Inst., Twenty-Fourth Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. Part 3: N-Z p 1293-1294 (SEE N94-20636 05-91
Other
Bidirectional Reflectance, Hazards, Landing Sites, Mars Surface, Normal Density Functions, Pixels, Planetary Geology, Scale Models, Surface Roughness, Morphology, Plains, Rocks, Sediments, Time Lag, Topography, Viking Mars Program
Scientific paper
In the coming decade, several lander missions to Mars are planned (e.g., MESUR Pathfinder, MESUR). One of the dangers facing planners of these missions is the rough topography observed at both Viking Lander sites. Both landing sites are ubiquitously covered with meter-scale boulders. Objects of this size pose obvious threats to soft landers, especially at Mars where the distance from Earth causes prohibitive time lags between the transmission of commands and feedback from the spacecraft. An obvious solution is to scout for a 'smooth' site prior to the landing. However, the best resolutions realizable on current and future missions (i.e., Mars Observer) are on the order of several meters. Even at this scale, boulders of 1-2 meters in size are unresolvable. Additionally, the amount of time and spacecraft resources required to search even a small area of the planet are unrealistic given other mission objectives. An alternative is to determine the 'roughness' of the surface at a subpixel scale using bidirectional reflectance observations. Much larger areas of the planet can be searched, and much of the search can easily be automated. The morphology of the martian plains observed by the Viking Landers is physically simple. The surface is covered with a layer (approximately flat lying) of aeolian sediment from which numerous outcrops of bedrock and boulders protrude. This morphology, while simple, will be difficult to characterize from orbit using traditional bidirectional reflectance models for two reasons. First, modeling the surface as facets with Gaussian or exponential slope distributions is not realistic given the morphology described above. Second, the roughness parameter is an 'average' of the roughness at scales ranging from the wavelength of light being scattered to the pixel size of the observation. Thus, there is no definite scale of roughness that can be extracted from the Hapke roughness parameter. Using the concepts of geometric and boolean models developed by several workers, we have developed a model for the bidirectional reflectance of a surface morphology comparable to that observed at the Viking Lander sites.
Arvidson Ray E.
Guinness Edward A.
Shepard Michael K.
No associations
LandOfFree
The roughness of the Martian surface: A scale dependent model does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The roughness of the Martian surface: A scale dependent model, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The roughness of the Martian surface: A scale dependent model will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1450553