Models for Stellar Coronae - Differences Between Hydrostatic and Dynamic Models

Details Models for Stellar Coronae - Differences Between Hydrostatic and Dynamic Models Models for Stellar Coronae - Differences Between Hydrostatic and Dynamic Models

May 1981

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1981a%26a....98..246h&link_type=abstract

Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol. 98, P. 246, 1981

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Astrophysics

3

Scientific paper

A dynamic and a static stellar coronal model is calculated for the same flux of mechanical energy specified in the photo sphere using the iterative two boundary value method of Hearn and Vardavas (1981). The dynamic model has lower temperature gradients in the transition region and a lower maximum coronal temperature than the static model. Further, the transition region in the dynamic model forms at a lower pressure than in the static model.
The solutions calculated by Rosner and Vaiana of the initial value problem (1977) gave a dynamic model which had higher temperature gradients in the transition region and a higher maximum coronal temperature than the static model.
This difference illustrates the errors that can result from the incorrect boundary conditions used in the initial value problem.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Models for Stellar Coronae - Differences Between Hydrostatic and Dynamic Models does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Models for Stellar Coronae - Differences Between Hydrostatic and Dynamic Models, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Models for Stellar Coronae - Differences Between Hydrostatic and Dynamic Models will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1440688