Fundamental discrepancy between experimental data on the solar cyclicity and modern theoretical models used for its description

Details Fundamental discrepancy between experimental data on the solar cyclicity and modern theoretical models used for its description Fundamental discrepancy between experimental data on the solar cyclicity and modern theoretical models used for its description

Apr 1999

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1999astl...25..263r&link_type=abstract

Astronomy Letters, Volume 25, Issue 4, April 1999, pp.263-268

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Astronomy

Scientific paper

Cyclic and shorter-period variations of local (sunspots) and large-scale solar magnetic fields during the past ~30 years are analyzed. It is concluded that in the solar interior there are two partially interconnected and spatially separated magnetic-field generation systems with fundamentally different properties. This result brings out one of the crucial factors explaining the failure of dynamo models of solar cyclicity to properly describe experimental data.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Fundamental discrepancy between experimental data on the solar cyclicity and modern theoretical models used for its description does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Fundamental discrepancy between experimental data on the solar cyclicity and modern theoretical models used for its description, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Fundamental discrepancy between experimental data on the solar cyclicity and modern theoretical models used for its description will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1430001