Some things we can infer about the Moon from the composition of the Apollo 16 regolith

Mathematics – Logic

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

46

Scientific paper

Characteristics of the regolith of Cayley plains as sampled at the Apollo 16 lunar landing site are reviewed and new compositional data are presented for samples of <1-mm fines ("soils") and 1-2 mm regolith particles. As a means of determining which of the many primary (igneous) and secondary (crystalline breccias) lithologic components that have been identified in the soil are volumetrically important and providing an estimate of their relative abundances, more than 3(106 combinations of components representing nearly every lithology that has been observed in the Apollo 16 regolith were systematically tested to determine which combinations best account for the composition of the soils. Conclusions drawn from the modeling include the following. At the site, mature soil from the Cayley plains consists of 64.5% +/- 2.7% components representing "prebasin" materials: anorthosites, feldspathic breccias, and a small amount (2.6% +/- 1.5% of total soil) of nonmare, mafic plutonic rocks, mostly gabbronorites. On average, these components are highly feldspathic, with average concentrations of 31-32% Al2O3 and 2-3% FeO and a molar Mg/(Mg+Fe) ratio of 0.68. The remaining 36% of the regolith is syn- and post-basin material: 28.8% +/- 2.4% MIMBs (mafic impact-melt breccias, i.e., "LKFM" and "VHA basalts") created at the time of basin formation, 6.0% +/- 1.4 % mare-derived material (impact and volcanic glass, crystalline basalt) with an average TiO2 concentration of 2.4%, and 1% post-basin meteoritic material. The MIMBs are the principal (80-90%) carrier of incompatible trace elements (rare earths, Th, etc.) and the carrier of about half of the siderophile elements and elements associated with mafic mineral phases (Fe, Mg, Mn, Cr, Sc). Most (71%) of the iron in the present regolith derives from syn- and post-basin sources (MIMBs, mare-derived material, and meteorites). Thus, although the bulk composition of the Apollo 16 regolith is nominally that of noritic anorthosite, the noritic part (the MIMBs) and the anorthositic part (the prebasin components) are largely unrelated. There is compositional evidence that 3-4% of the soil is Th-rich material such as that occurring at the Apollo 14 site, and one fragment of this type was found among the small regolith particles studied here. If regolith such as that represented by the Apollo 16 ancient regolith breccias was a protolith of the present regolith, such regolith cannot exceed about 71% of the present regolith; the rest must be material added or redistributed since closure of the ancient regolith breccias. The post-closure material includes the mare-derived material and the Apollo-14-like component. Compositions of all mature surface soils from Apollo 16, even those collected 4 km apart on the Cayley plains, are very similar, in stark contrast to the wide compositional range of the lithologies of which the soil is composed. This uniformity indicates that the ratio of MIMBs to feldspathic prebasin components is not highly variable in the megaregolith over distances of a kilometer, that there is no large, subsurface concentrations of "pure" mafic impact-melt breccia, and that the intimate mixing is inherent to the Cayley plains at a gross scale. Thus the mixing of mafic impact-melt breccias and feldspathic prebasin components must have occurred during formation and deposition of the Cayley plains; such uniformity could not have been achieved by small post-deposition impacts into a stratified megaregolith. Using this conclusion as one constraint, the known distribution of Th on the lunar surface as another, and the assumption that the Imbrium impact is primarily responsible for formation of the Cayley plains, arguments are presented that the Apollo 16 MIMBs derive from the Imbrium region, and, consequently, that a quarter of the Apollo 16 regolith is primary Imbrium ejecta in the form of mafic impact-melt breccias.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Some things we can infer about the Moon from the composition of the Apollo 16 regolith does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Some things we can infer about the Moon from the composition of the Apollo 16 regolith, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Some things we can infer about the Moon from the composition of the Apollo 16 regolith will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1414856

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.