Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2002-11-27
Phys.Lett. B562 (2003) 161-165
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
Submitted for publicaton in ApJL
Scientific paper
10.1016/S0370-2693(03)00593-8
Galama et al. have recently reported their follow-up measurements of the radio afterglow (AG) of the Gamma Ray Burst (GRB) 991208, up to 293 days after burst, and their reanalysis of the broad-band AG, in the framework of standard fireball models. They advocate a serious revision of their prior analysis and conclusions, based on optical data and on their earlier observations during the first two weeks of the AG. We comment on their work and fill a lacuna: these authors have overlooked the possibility of comparing their new data to the available predictions of the cannonball (CB) model, based --like their incorrect predictions-- on the first round of data. The new data are in good agreement with these CB-model predictions. This is in spite of the fact that, in comparison to the fireball models, the CB model is much simpler, much more predictive, has many fewer parameters, practically no free choices... and it describes well --on a universal basis-- all the measured AGs of GRBs of known redshift.
Dado Shlomo
Dar Arnon
de Rujula Alvaro
No associations
LandOfFree
Fireballs and cannonballs confront the afterglow of GRB 991208 does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Fireballs and cannonballs confront the afterglow of GRB 991208, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Fireballs and cannonballs confront the afterglow of GRB 991208 will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-140213