Geochemistry and bonding of thiospinel minerals

Other

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

3

Scientific paper

The thiospinel group of minerals present a variety of interesting problems in mineral chemistry. Carrollite (CuCo 2 S 4 ), linnaeite (Co 3 S 4 ), siegenite [(Co, Ni) 3 S 4 ], polydymite (Ni 3 S 4 ) and violante (FeNi 2 S 4 ) occur in ore deposits, daubréelite [(Fe, Mn, Zn)Cr 2 S 4 ] is present in meteorites and greigite (Fe 3 S 4 ) is found in lacustrine sediments. This paper illustrates how the crystal chemistry, geochemistry and certain physical properties may be interpreted by molecular orbital and band theories of the chemical bond. In the spinel structure, transition metal ions occur in tetrahedral and octahedral coordinations, and 3d electrons of cations bonded to sulphur atoms are distributed amongst non-bonding and anti-bonding molecular orbitals. The composition ranges, geochemistry, and variations of cell parameters, microhardness, reflectivities and relative stabilities of thiospinels are directly related to the numbers of electrons in antibonding molecular orbitals. Linnaeite, which is the most stable thiospinel mineral in the system Cu-Co-Ni-Fe-S, has the smallest number of antibonding electrons. It has the smallest cell edge, highest reflectivity and largest microhardness. With increasing electron occupancy of the antibonding orbitals, each of these physical properties, together with the thermal stabilities, decrease along the linnaeite-siegenite-polydymite, linnaeite-carrollite and violarite-polydymite series. In each of these minerals, the unusually small cell edge may be correlated with the occurrence of transition metal ions in low-spin states. The metallic conductivity and Pauli-paramagnetism of many of these minerals is related to electron delocalization in antibonding molecular orbitals. Iron cations occur in high-spin states in greigite, giving rise to increased numbers of electrons in antibonding orbitals. As a result greigite has a larger cell edge and lower thermal stability than other thiospinel minerals. The semiconducting and ferrimagnetic properties of greigite indicate that the 3d electrons are more localized on the cation than sulphospinels in the Cu-Co-Ni-Fe-S system. Absence of solid-solution between violarite and greigite is attributed to differing spin-states of octahedral Fe(II) ions, which are low-spin in violarite and high-spin in greigite. The high thermal stability of daubréelite is due to the large octahedral site preference energy of Cr 3+ in the structure. The preference of transition metal ions for octahedral coordination is reflected by the ease in which thiospinel phases transform to a cation defect NiAs structure at elevated pressures and temperatures. As a result, polymorphic transitions involving thiospinel phases are postulated in the mantle and in shocked meteorites.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Geochemistry and bonding of thiospinel minerals does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Geochemistry and bonding of thiospinel minerals, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Geochemistry and bonding of thiospinel minerals will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1396763

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.