Why anthropic reasoning cannot predict Lambda

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

4 pages, 1 figure. Discussion slighlty expanded, refs added, conclusions unchanged. Matches published version

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.201301

We revisit anthropic arguments purporting to explain the measured value of the cosmological constant. We argue that different ways of assigning probabilities to candidate universes lead to totally different anthropic predictions. As an explicit example, we show that weighting different universes by the total number of possible observations leads to an extremely small probability for observing a value of Lambda equal to or greater than what we now measure. We conclude that anthropic reasoning within the framework of probability as frequency is ill-defined and that in the absence of a fundamental motivation for selecting one weighting scheme over another the anthropic principle cannot be used to explain the value of Lambda, nor, likely, any other physical parameters.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Why anthropic reasoning cannot predict Lambda does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Why anthropic reasoning cannot predict Lambda, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Why anthropic reasoning cannot predict Lambda will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-139211

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.