Evolution of the slab bending radius and the bending dissipation in three-dimensional subduction models with a variable slab to upper mantle viscosity ratio

Details Evolution of the slab bending radius and the bending dissipation in three-dimensional subduction models with a variable slab to upper mantle viscosity ratio Evolution of the slab bending radius and the bending dissipation in three-dimensional subduction models with a variable slab to upper mantle viscosity ratio

Oct 2009

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2009e%26psl.288..309s&link_type=abstract

Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 288, Issue 1-2, p. 309-319.

Computer Science

12

Scientific paper

Three-dimensional laboratory subduction models are presented investigating the influence of the slab/upper mantle viscosity ratio (ηSP/ηUM) on the slab bending radius (RB), with ηSP/ηUM = 66-1375. Here, RB is non-dimensionalized by dividing it by the upper mantle thickness (TUM). The results show that RB/TUM varies with time, reaching a maximum when the subduction velocity is maximum. Furthermore, RB/TUM increases approximately linearly with increasing ηSP/ηUM for the investigated viscosity range. The model results show that the slab bending force (FBe) and the energy dissipation during bending (φBe) are small compared to the negative buoyancy force of the slab (FBu) and the potential energy release during sinking (φBu). Maxima in φBe/φBu (≈ FBe/FBu) are reached in the early stage of subduction when RB/TUM is minimum and the slab tip is at 220-440 km depth. Maximum φBe/φBu increases with increasing ηSP/ηUM, with φBe/φBu(max) = 0.06, 0.11, 0.18 and 0.22 for ηSP/ηUM = 66, 217, 709 and 1375, respectively. For subduction depths > 220-440 km, φBe/φBu = 0.02-0.11 for all viscosity ratios. Assuming that in nature ηSP/ηUM < 1000, and that viscous dissipation during plan view curvature of the slab is ≤ 1%, the models predict that in nature most of the slab's potential energy is used to drive mantle flow (on average 88%-97% and minimally 81%), whilst only a small component is used to bend the subducting plate at the hinge (on average 2-11% and maximally 18%). Applying the model predictions for RB/TUM and φBe/φBu to natural subduction zones implies that in nature ηSP/ηUM = 1-7 × 102 and ηUM = 0.8-2.7 × 1020 Pa·s. Finally, the laboratory models, which use glucose syrup and silicone oil as modelling materials, highlight the importance of accurate control on temperature during an experiment. New material investigations show that the viscosity of these two materials decreases exponentially with temperature in the range 3-33 °C, their density decreases approximately linearly with temperature, and their coefficient of thermal volumetric expansion is 3.8-4.2 × 10- 4 C- 1 (glucose syrup) and 9.2 × 10- 4 C- 1 (silicone oil).

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Evolution of the slab bending radius and the bending dissipation in three-dimensional subduction models with a variable slab to upper mantle viscosity ratio does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Evolution of the slab bending radius and the bending dissipation in three-dimensional subduction models with a variable slab to upper mantle viscosity ratio, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Evolution of the slab bending radius and the bending dissipation in three-dimensional subduction models with a variable slab to upper mantle viscosity ratio will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1359536