Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy
Scientific paper
Oct 1995
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1995apj...452l..99k&link_type=abstract
Astrophysical Journal Letters v.452, p.L99
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy
22
Galaxies: Luminosity Function, Mass Function, Galaxies: Clusters: Individual Name: Abell 1656, Galaxies: Clusters: Individual Name: Abell 1367, Galaxies: Clusters: Individual Name: Abell 1631, Galaxies: Clusters: Individual Name: Abell 1644
Scientific paper
We have carried out a photometric survey of four nearby clusters of galaxies, A1656, A1367, A1644, and A1631, with mosaic CCD cameras. The observed luminosity functions of A1656, A1367, and A1631 cannot be approximated by the Schechter function with alpha = -1.25 over the whole magnitude range -21.5 <= MR <= -16.0, although the bright parts (MR <= -18) have a Schechter form in all of the four clusters. The luminosity functions of late-type galaxies have a similar shape for all the clusters, while those of faint early-type galaxies (MR >= -18) show a large variation from cluster to cluster. Only A1644 lacks the faint early-type galaxies, and its luminosity function is in the Schechter form over all of the magnitude range observed.
Doi Mamoru
Kashikawa Nobunari
Okamura Sadanori
Sekiguchi Maki
Shimasaku Kazuhiro
No associations
LandOfFree
Differences in the Luminosity Functions of Faint Early-Type and Faint Late-Type Galaxies in Four Nearby Clusters of Galaxies does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Differences in the Luminosity Functions of Faint Early-Type and Faint Late-Type Galaxies in Four Nearby Clusters of Galaxies, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Differences in the Luminosity Functions of Faint Early-Type and Faint Late-Type Galaxies in Four Nearby Clusters of Galaxies will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1353024