Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy
Scientific paper
Mar 1986
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1986natur.320...39n&link_type=abstract
Nature (ISSN 0028-0836), vol. 320, March 6, 1986, p. 39-41. CNR-supported research.
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy
14
Mercury (Planet), Perihelions, Relativity, Solar Orbits, Orbital Elements, Mercury (Planet), Perihelion, Astronomy, Orbits, Theoretical Studies, Motion, Celestial Mechanics, Radar Methods, Parameters, Calculations, Procedure, Techniques, Analysis
Scientific paper
An apparent uncertainty in the value of the theoretical prediction for the perihelion advance of the orbit of Mercury within general relativity, as cited in various sources, is investigated. The origin of this discrepancy is an article by Clemence (1947), who used unconventional values for the astronomical unit and the speed of light in his calculation of the predicted advance. Since that time, virtually everyone has followed suit. Although the current value of the prediction, using the best accepted values for the astronomical constants and for the orbital elements of Mercury, is 42.98 arcsec per 100 yr, there is a preponderance of citations over the past 25 yr of Clemence's value of 43.03 arcsec per 100 yr. Here, the accurate value is derived and the source of Clemence's value is uncovered.
Nobili Anna M.
Will Clifford M.
No associations
LandOfFree
The real value of Mercury's perihelion advance does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The real value of Mercury's perihelion advance, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The real value of Mercury's perihelion advance will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1285914