Other
Scientific paper
Jan 1999
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1999nvm..conf...43n&link_type=abstract
Workshop on New Views of the Moon 2: Understanding the Moon Through the Integration of Diverse Datasets, p. 43
Other
Kreep, Lunar Core, Lunar Geology, Moon, Volcanoes, Lunar Maria, Lunar Composition, Lunar Rocks, Lunar Evolution, Geochemistry, Glass, Lunar Prospector, Ilmenite
Scientific paper
Remotely-gathered Lunar Prospector data have demonstrated the existence of a lunar "hotspot" on the near side of the Moon. This hotspot contains relatively high abundances of KREEPy incompatible trace elements (i.e., Th). It is generally accepted that primordial KREEP or urKREEP represents the residual liquid after the crystallization of a lunar magma ocean (LMO). The crystalline products from the LMO formed the source regions for the mare basalts. Lunar volcanic glasses cannot be genetically related to the crystalline mare basalts, and experimental petrology indicates they are derived from greater (> 400 km) depths than the mare basalts. Questions to be addressed include: (1) What was the extent of LMO melting? (2) What is the composition of the core? (3) Are there distinct geochemical reservoirs in the Moon? (4) Is there evidence of garnet in the lunar interior? (5) What caused the formation of the lunar hotspot? The scale of the LMO has been suggested to be whole Moon melting or only the outer about 400 km. If whole Moon melting is invoked, then differentiation of the Moon into a flotation plagioclase-rich crust, a mafic mineral cumulate mantle, and a Fe-rich core is more easily facilitated. However, as pointed out, if the material that formed the Moon came primarily from the already-differentiated Earth mantle, there may not be enough Fe to form a metallic Fe core on the Moon. Authors have suggested that the lunar core is made up of dense, ilmenite-rich, late-stage cumulates from the LMO. This can be tested by examining the Zr/Hf ratios of mare basalts and, where possible, the volcanic glasses. Partition coefficients for Zr and Hf in ilmenite are 0.29-0.32 and 0.4-0.43, respectively, with Zr being less compatible. Therefore, extraction of an "ilmenite" core would have a profound effect on the Zr/Hf ratio of urKREEP as ilmenite is a late-stage fractionating LMO phase. Assuming either a "primitive mantle" or chondritic starting material with a Zr/Hf ratio of 36-37, ilmenite extraction will increase this ratio in the residual liquid. Conversely, derivation of a melt from a source rich in ilmenite will produce a melt of lower Zr/ Hf ratio. Hughes and Schmitt defined a mean Zr/Hf for KREEP of 41.0 +/- 0.4, about 39 for Apollo 15 basalts, and 30-32 for Apollo 11, 12, and 17 basalts, with the decreases in Zr/Hf broadly correlating with La/Yb. However, literature data for Apollo 15 KREEP basalts and the KREEP-rich Apollo 14 mare basalts exhibit little variation in Zr/Hf from 36, indicating the KREEP component did not result from a major fractionation of ilmenite and suggesting that the lunar core is probably metallic in overall composition. With volcanic glasses being unrelated to the mare basalts and derived from greater depths, compositional comparisons allow their source regions to be compared. Highly siderophile elements Au and Ir are more abundant in the glasses relative to the basalts. As these elements are generally incompatible in silicate minerals, crystal fractionation experienced by the basalts will tend to increase the Au and It abundances. Therefore, the glasses may be derived from a source enriched in highly siderophile elements such as the platinum-group elements (PGEs) represented by Ir, relative to the source of the basalts. This observation can be accommodated with the basalts being derived from the LMO cumulates and the glasses derived from a source that represents "primitive Moon" that did not melt and, therefore, did not have its budget of PGEs and Au reduced through core formation. This can be tested by analyzing mare basalts and glasses for the PGEs. Although analytically challenging, the first PGE patterns in lunar samples were demonstrated that the source regions for the different Apollo 12 basalts could not be differentiated on the basis of PGE budgets, although the profiles are typical of silicate melts. Analysis of other trace-element data indicate that the high-field-strength elements can be used to differentiate between high- and low-Ti basalts. Also, the volcanic glasses were derived from a source with a higher Zr/Y ratio relative to the basalts, consistent with retention of garnet in the residue. If the glasses were derived from > 400 km, garnet could be stable. It is concluded that the volcanic glasses were derived from a source that contained garnet, but escaped the melting that formed the LMO. The mare basalts were derived from the LMO cumulate pile. Basaltic samples from Apollo 14 exhibit a range in ITE. They also exhibit a range of ages from 4.33 Ga to 3.96 Ga with the older basalts being KREEP-poor and the younger being KREEP-rich. Prospector mapping has identified relatively high Th abundances in this area, suggesting a large KREEP component is present at or near the surface. LMO "layer cake models" have residual urKREEP sandwiched between the mafic cumulate mantle and the plagioclase flotation cumulate crust. However, late-stage cumulates and the residual liquid will be more dense that the early mafic cumulates resulting in gravitational instabilities and overturn of the cumulate pile. This could transport urKREEP to the base of the LMO cumulate pile, but above the glass source region. The effect of Earth on the symmetry of the Moon has displaced the low-density crust, producing a thicker crust on the farside. This has produced an offset of the center of mass for the Moon toward Earth. It is suggested that the gravitational forces of the Earth pooled the urKREEP beneath at the base of the LMO on the lunar nearside. Heating through radioactive decay produced thermal instabilities, resulting in a plume of hot, KREEPy material rising adiabatically beneath the Apollo 14 site. The oldest Apollo basalts contain no evidence of a KREEPy component, suggesting diapiric rise of the KREEPy plume had not occurred at this time. Additional information contained in original.
No associations
LandOfFree
The Interior of the Moon, Core Formation, and the Lunar Hotspot: What Samples Tell Us does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The Interior of the Moon, Core Formation, and the Lunar Hotspot: What Samples Tell Us, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The Interior of the Moon, Core Formation, and the Lunar Hotspot: What Samples Tell Us will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1276529