Was one sunspot cycle lost in late XVIII century?

Details Was one sunspot cycle lost in late XVIII century? Was one sunspot cycle lost in late XVIII century?

May 2001

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2001a%26a...370l..31u&link_type=abstract

Astronomy and Astrophysics, v.370, p.L31-L34 (2001)

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Astrophysics

33

Sun: Activity, Sun: Sunspots, Sun: Dalton Minimum, Sun: Solar Cycle

Scientific paper

We suggest that one solar cycle was lost in the beginning of the Dalton minimum because of sparse and partly unreliable sunspot observations. So far this cycle was combined with the preceding activity to form the exceptionally long solar cycle #4 in 1784-1799, leading to an irregular phase evolution of sunspot activity (known as a phase catastrophe) and other problems. We reanalyze the available group sunspot numbers and suggest that solar cycle #4 was in fact a superposition of two cycles: a normal cycle in 1784-1793 ending at the start of the Dalton minimum and a new weak cycle in 1793-1800 which was the first full cycle within the Dalton minimum. Including the new cycle resolves the problems mentioned above and leads to a consistent view of sunspot activity around the Dalton minimum. Moreover, it will restore the Gnevyshev-Ohl rule of cycle pairing throughout the 400-year interval of sunspot observations.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Was one sunspot cycle lost in late XVIII century? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Was one sunspot cycle lost in late XVIII century?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Was one sunspot cycle lost in late XVIII century? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1266385