Other
Scientific paper
Dec 2001
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2001agufm.u42b..03o&link_type=abstract
American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2001, abstract #U42B-03
Other
1010 Chemical Evolution, 1060 Planetary Geochemistry (5405, 5410, 5704, 5709, 6005, 6008), 8125 Evolution Of The Earth
Scientific paper
Comparison between atmospheric noble gases (except for He) and solar (or meteoritic) noble gases clearly suggests that the Earth should have much more Xe than is present in air, and thus that up to about 90 percent of terrestrial Xe is missing from the Earth (1). In this report, we discuss implications of these observations on I-Pu chronology of the Earth and on the origin of terrestrial He3. Whetherill (2) first noted that an estimated I129/I127 ratio (3x10-6) in the proto-Earth was about two orders of magnitude smaller than values commonly observed in meteorites (10-4), and pointed out the possibility that Earth formation postdated meteorites by about 100Ma. Ozima and Podosek (1999) came to a similar conclusion on the basis of I129/I127-Pu244/U238 systematics (1). In this report, we reexamine I-Pu systematics with new data for crustal I content (295 ppb for a bulk crust, (3)). With imposition of an estimated value of 86 percent missing Xe as a constraint on terrestrial Xe inventory, we conclude that the best estimate for a formation age of the Earth is about 28Ma after the initial condensation of the solar nebula (at 4.57Ga). The formation age thus estimated is significantly later than the generally assumed age of meteorites. We also argue from the I-Pu systematics that the missing Xe became missing place about 120Ma after Earth formation. Assuming that the Earth is mostly degassed, the I-Pu formation age of the Earth can be reasonably assumed to represent a whole Earth event. Therefore, we interpret that the I-Pu age of the Earth represents the time when the Earth started to retain noble gases. More specifically, this may correspond to the time when the proto-Earth attained a sufficient size to exert the necessary gravitational force. A giant impact could be another possibility, but it remains to be seen whether or not a giant impact could quantitatively remove heavier noble gases from the Earth. It is interesting to speculate that missing Xe was sequestered in the core during core formation. Core formation time would then be related to the time of the missing Xe event. The above estimated missing Xe age is close to the core formation age suggested from Nb-Zr systematics (4) and from U-Pb systematics (5), but considerably later than that suggested from Hf-W systematics (6). From a comparison of relative elemental abundance of noble gases between the Earth and the solar composition, we show that terrestrial He3 may be totally unrelated to heavier noble gases. This requires independent origin of terrestrial He3 from heavy noble gases. 1.Ozima M. and Podosek F.A. (1999) JGR, 104(BII), 25493. 2.Whetherill G.W. (1975) Ann. Rev. Nuclear Science, 25, 283. 3.Muramatsu Y. and Wedepohl K.H. (1998) Chemical Geology, 147, 201. 4. Jacobsen S.B. and Yin Q.Z. (2001) Lunar Planetary Science, XXXII, 1961.pdf (abstract). 5.Galer S.J.G. and Goldstein S.L. (1995) in Geophysical Monograph 95, 75-98, AGU. 6.Halliday A.N., Lee D.-C. and Jacobsen S.B. (2000) in Origin of the Earth and Moon, 45-62, Univ. Arizona Press.
Ozima Minoru
Podoesk F. A.
No associations
LandOfFree
Noble gas Records of Early Evolution of the Earth does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Noble gas Records of Early Evolution of the Earth, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Noble gas Records of Early Evolution of the Earth will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1240077