Distribution of 26Al in the Early Solar System- A Reappraisal

Mathematics – Logic

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

5

Scientific paper

The discovery of excess ^26Mg correlated with ^27Al/^24Mg in refractory inclusions in chondritic meteorites (Lee et al., 1976), interpreted as being due to in situ decay of the extinct radionuclide ^26Al, was followed shortly by the realization that ^26Al was probably heterogeneous in the early solar nebula and therefore of questionable value either as a heat source for early planetary melting or as a fine-scale chronometer of early solar nebula events (e.g. Hutcheon, 1982). Recent correlated petrologic/isotopic studies (e.g. Podosek et al., 1991) have indicated that the "disturbed" Al-Mg isotopic systematics within many individual inclusions may be due to complex evolutionary histories rather than initial isotopic heterogeneities. For this reason a reevaluation of the nebular distribution of ^26Al seems in order. A compilation of nearly 640 published and unpublished Al-Mg isotopic analyses (mostly by ion microprobe) of Al-rich objects in 10 meteorites (mostly Ca-Al-rich inclusions and Ca-Al-rich separated mineral grains) shows a remarkably consistent upper limit for initial ^26Al/^27Al of ~5 x 10^-5. This upper limit apparently transcends meteorite classification within the carbonaceous chondrites; at a minimum, enough data exist to indicate that there is no significant difference between inclusions from any of the CV3 or CM2 meteorites. Calculation of initial ^26Al/^27Al for all analyses of non-FUN samples (assuming uniform initial ^26Mg/^24Mg = 0.13932) shows a bimodal distribution (Fig. 1) of isotopic compositions, with peaks near ~4.5 x 10^-5 and ~0. Of the analyses showing near-zero initial ^26Al/^27Al, most come either from CM2 hibonite grains or from CV3 inclusions for which good evidence exists for later reprocessing. Collectively, the data suggest that ^26Al was in fact rather uniformly distributed, i.e. throughout the regions of the early solar nebula where parent bodies for several chondrite subtypes formed. A widespread upper limit for initial ^26Al/^27Al implies that the nebular isotopic heterogeneity required by FUN inclusions and many CM2 hibonite grains was a second order phenomenon. The marked bimodality of initial ^26Al/^27Al is the result of two processes, nebular heterogeneity and secondary reprocessing. However, the two Al-isotopic reservoirs must have remained remarkably separate or else always mixed in nearly the same proportions in order for the ^26Al/^27Al of = ~5 x 10^-5 end member to be so well represented. Much reprocessing of inclusions apparently took place at least several half-lives of ^26Al after initial CAI formation. Reprocessing cannot, however, easily explain the preservation of nuclear isotope anomalies in e.g. FUN inclusions and CM2 hibonites that show little or no excess ^26Mg. References: Hutcheon I.D. (1982) Amer. Chem. Soc. Symposium Ser., 176, 95-128. Lee T., Papanastassiou D.A., and Wasserburg G.J. (1976) Geophys. Res. Lett. 3, 109-112. Podosek F. A., Zinner E. K., MacPherson G. J., Lundberg L. L., Brannon J. C., and Fahey A. J. (1991) Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 55, 1083-1110. Figure 1, which in the hard copy appears here, shows all non-FUN CAI and refractory grains with Al/Mg > 100.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Distribution of 26Al in the Early Solar System- A Reappraisal does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Distribution of 26Al in the Early Solar System- A Reappraisal, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Distribution of 26Al in the Early Solar System- A Reappraisal will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1209552

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.