Differences in the AGN Populations of Groups and Clusters: Clues to AGN Evolution

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

accepted to ApJL, 5 pages, 1 figure

Scientific paper

10.1086/511030

We combine optical and X-ray data for eight low redshift ($z\sim 0.06$) poor groups of galaxies from the {\it XI}({\it XMM/IMACS}) Groups Project to study the AGN population in the group environment. Among $\sim 140$ group members, we identify five AGN based on their optical emission lines. None of these optically-selected AGN are detected by {\it XMM-Newton}. One additional AGN is discovered in the {\it XMM-Newton} observations. This X-ray detected AGN, which has no obvious AGN emission line signatures in its optical spectrum, is a member of the only X-ray luminous group in our sample. The lack of a significant population of X-ray bright, but optically dull AGN among less dynamically evolved groups is in stark contrast to the large fraction of such objects in rich clusters of galaxies (Martini et al. 2006). We suggest this result can be explained by a physical scenario for AGN accretion evolution: AGN activity is initially triggered by galaxy merging, leading to a high accretion rate and an optically dominant phase (via thin disk accretion). As the accretion rate drops in time, the AGN gradually enters an X-ray dominant low-accretion phase (via a radiative inefficient accretion flow). In this picture, optical- and X-ray-selected AGN are the same population of supermassive black holes observed at different epochs. Within the context of this scenario, the majority of AGN in poor groups are in the high-accretion optically dominant phase, while the AGN population in rich clusters is mostly in the low-accretion X-ray dominant phase.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Differences in the AGN Populations of Groups and Clusters: Clues to AGN Evolution does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Differences in the AGN Populations of Groups and Clusters: Clues to AGN Evolution, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Differences in the AGN Populations of Groups and Clusters: Clues to AGN Evolution will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-120304

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.