Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy
Scientific paper
May 2004
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2004apj...606l.171t&link_type=abstract
The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 606, Issue 2, pp. L171-L171.
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy
6
Errata, Addenda
Scientific paper
We have mentioned that we normalized the parameters for the luminosity function by the Hubble constant H0=100 km s-1 Mpc-1 however, for the characteristic luminosity L* we erroneously normalized it by H0=70 km s-1 Mpc-1. As a result, we have proposed wrong numerical factors for L*. In addition, there is a typographic error in the exponent of equation (6) of the published manuscript. Correct values are as follows: L*=(4.34+/-0.86)×108 h-2 [Lsolar] for equation (4), and L*=(2.50+/-0.44)×109 h-2 [Lsolar] and L*=(9.55+/-0.20)×108 h-2 [Lsolar] for equations (5) and (6), respectively. All the other parameters are correct. The errors have occurred only in the final conversion, and they do not affect our discussions and conclusions at all. We thank P. Ranalli for pointing out the errors.
Ishii Takako T.
Takeuchi Tsutomu T.
Yoshikawa Kohji
No associations
LandOfFree
Erratum: ``The Luminosity Function of IRAS Point Source Catalog Redshift Survey Galaxies'' (ApJ, 587, L89 [2003]) does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Erratum: ``The Luminosity Function of IRAS Point Source Catalog Redshift Survey Galaxies'' (ApJ, 587, L89 [2003]), we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Erratum: ``The Luminosity Function of IRAS Point Source Catalog Redshift Survey Galaxies'' (ApJ, 587, L89 [2003]) will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1180539