Mathematics – Logic
Scientific paper
Nov 2010
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2010apj...723..966p&link_type=abstract
The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 723, Issue 1, pp. 966-968 (2010).
Mathematics
Logic
Cosmological Parameters, Methods: Statistical
Scientific paper
The Hubble constant enters big bang cosmology by quantifying the expansion rate of the universe. Existing statistical methods used to estimate Hubble's constant only partially take into account random measurement errors. As a consequence, estimates of Hubble's constant are statistically inconsistent and systematically too low. Using the simplest of the existing methods to illustrate the problem, we show that the change in estimate is 1.2%. The more advanced techniques suffer from the same deficiency.
Budtz-Jørgensen Esben
Holst Klaus K.
Petersen Jørgen H.
No associations
LandOfFree
Correcting a Statistical Artifact in the Estimation of the Hubble Constant Based on Type Ia Supernovae Results in a Change in Estimate of 1.2% does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Correcting a Statistical Artifact in the Estimation of the Hubble Constant Based on Type Ia Supernovae Results in a Change in Estimate of 1.2%, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Correcting a Statistical Artifact in the Estimation of the Hubble Constant Based on Type Ia Supernovae Results in a Change in Estimate of 1.2% will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1159984