Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2000-11-28
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
4 pages, proceedings of the 5th Integral Meeting in Alicante Spain
Scientific paper
It has been suggested that both X-ray bursters and millisecond radio pulsars may be strange (quark) stars, rather than neutron stars. Confirming (or rejecting) this suggestion may require knowing what role strong-field effects of general relativity play in the accretion flow of the compact X-ray source in low-mass X-ray binaries (LMXBs). We discuss the range of rotational and orbital frequencies, and of masses expected in various models of strange stars, and compare them with observational constraints, suggested by the observed frequencies of kHz QPOs. We explain why future observations of transients (such as SAX J~1808.4-3658) may be crucial to understanding the precise nature of the accreting source. For flattened (e.g., rapidly rotating) distributions of matter, an innermost (marginally) stable orbit may be present even if relativistic effects are negligible. Depending on the stellar rotation rate, the same value of orbital frequency in the innermost stable orbit (say, 0.9 kHz) can correspond to a star of mass equal to $2.4M_\odot$, $1.4M_\odot$, $0.1M_\odot$, $0.01M_\odot$, or less.
No associations
LandOfFree
Quark stars in Low-Mass X-ray Binaries: for and against does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Quark stars in Low-Mass X-ray Binaries: for and against, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Quark stars in Low-Mass X-ray Binaries: for and against will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-115437