The Laws of Nature

Mathematics – Probability

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

MR. JESSUP' letter raises what, I think, is a fundamental point concerning the significance of relativity theory. In adopting that theory, we do not assume that ``no subsequent developments will ever point to the probability of some spatio-temporal particularization of the framework of the universe''. We simply regard scientific theory as a description of the world apprehended by experience (more exactly, the correlation of experiences themselves), and require that it shall not include features for which experience offers no evidence. For that reason we regard a theory which includes the existence of absolute velocity as invalid. If future experience should enable us to detect absolute velocity, or even ``leave us only the possibility of inferring its existence from some otherwise inexplicable phenomenon'', the situation would be altered, and the same principle would then require us to include it in our description. In brief, scientific theory should be, so far as possible, conterminous with experience.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

The Laws of Nature does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with The Laws of Nature, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The Laws of Nature will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1132521

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.