Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2008-09-24
Astronomische Nachrichten 328, 8 (2007) 805 - 808
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
Scientific paper
Exoplanetary transit and stellar oscillation surveys require a very high precision photometry. The instrumental noise has therefore to be minimized. First, we perform a semi-analytical model of different noise sources. We show that the noise due the CCD electrodes can be overcome using a Gaussian PSF (Point Spread Function) of full width half maximum larger than 1.6 pixels. We also find that for a PSF size of a few pixels, the photometric aperture has to be at least 2.5 times larger than the PSF full width half maximum. Then, we compare a front- with a back-illuminated CCD through a Monte-Carlo simulation. Both cameras give the same results for a PSF full width half maximum larger than 1.5 pixels. All these simulations are applied to the A STEP (Antarctica Search for Transiting Extrasolar Planets) project. As a result, we choose a front-illuminated camera for A STEP because of its better resolution and lower price, and we will use a PSF larger than 1.6 pixels.
Blazit Alain
Crouzet Nicolas
Fressin François
Guillot Tristan
No associations
LandOfFree
Front- vs. back-illuminated CCD cameras for photometric surveys: a noise budget analysis does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Front- vs. back-illuminated CCD cameras for photometric surveys: a noise budget analysis, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Front- vs. back-illuminated CCD cameras for photometric surveys: a noise budget analysis will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-111636