Comparison of two methods of accounting for the nongravitational effects in the motion of comets

Details Comparison of two methods of accounting for the nongravitational effects in the motion of comets Comparison of two methods of accounting for the nongravitational effects in the motion of comets

Sep 1977

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1977avest..11..144m&link_type=abstract

Astronomicheskii Vestnik, vol. 11, July-Sept. 1977, p. 144-149. In Russian.

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Astronomy

Celestial Mechanics, Comets, Elliptical Orbits, Kepler Laws, Orbital Elements, Differential Equations, Eccentric Orbits, Equations Of Motion, Newton Theory, Secular Variations, Tables (Data)

Scientific paper

Marsden's differential equations of the motion of comets and the Newtonian equation for elliptical Keplerian osculating elements yield a relationship between Marsden's results and calculations of secular corrections in the orbits of elements obtained by Dubiago's method. An example using the comet Schaumasse shows that the secular corrections to the semimajor axis and to the eccentricity are in agreement, although different techniques were used to obtain them.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Comparison of two methods of accounting for the nongravitational effects in the motion of comets does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comparison of two methods of accounting for the nongravitational effects in the motion of comets, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparison of two methods of accounting for the nongravitational effects in the motion of comets will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1093484