Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
Jan 2002
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2002a%26a...381l..37t&link_type=abstract
Astronomy and Astrophysics, v.381, p.L37-L40 (2002)
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
11
Galaxies: General, Cosmology
Scientific paper
We present new evidence for the extragalactic Cepheid distance bias. A dependence between the Hubble parameter and the absolute Cepheid magnitude limit for a galaxy may be interpreted as a significant bias in the derived photometric distances: those from Cepheid samples with a bright absolute magnitude limit apparently are underestimated. This may be caused not only by the dispersion of bar {M} at a fixed Cepheid period, but also by the whole amplitude of variation, together with an upper limit in the period of the observed Cepheids, and other factors. If so, then the value of H0 based on methods using Cepheid distances is expected to be often overestimated (i.e. the distances underestimated). We discuss whether the effect could be not real, but rather caused by uncertainties in kinematical distances.
Paturel Georges
Teerikorpi Pekka
No associations
LandOfFree
Evidence for the extragalactic Cepheid distance bias from the kinematical distance scale does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Evidence for the extragalactic Cepheid distance bias from the kinematical distance scale, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Evidence for the extragalactic Cepheid distance bias from the kinematical distance scale will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1085900