Statistics
Scientific paper
Oct 1994
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1994apj...433..845t&link_type=abstract
Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 433, no. 2, p. 845-851
Statistics
1
Astrometry, Astronomical Catalogs, Comparison, Error Analysis, Reference Stars, Statistical Analysis, Statistical Correlation
Scientific paper
We use the general method of compiled data set analysis developed in our first paper (Bucciarelli et. al. 1994) and extend our analysis of fundamental star catalogs to include the two American ones. The problems found in the FK3/FK4/FK5 sequence are not present in either the GC or the N30. This lends support to the hypothesis advanced in our previous paper that the FK3, and to a lesser extent the FK4 declination system, are distorted by high angular frequency systematics. On the other hand, both the GC and N30 equatorial coordinate and proper motion distributions nicely follow the predictions of mathematical statistics. As with the FK3/FK4/FK5 analysis, the new results are as seen by the FK5 (on the FK4/B1950.0 system).
Bucciarelli Beatrice
Taff Laurence G.
No associations
LandOfFree
The analysis of star catalogs. 2: an intercomparison among the GC, the N30, and the FK5(B1950.0/FK4) does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The analysis of star catalogs. 2: an intercomparison among the GC, the N30, and the FK5(B1950.0/FK4), we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The analysis of star catalogs. 2: an intercomparison among the GC, the N30, and the FK5(B1950.0/FK4) will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1070368