Astrophysical Jet Simulations: Comparing Different Numerical Methods

Details Astrophysical Jet Simulations: Comparing Different Numerical Methods Astrophysical Jet Simulations: Comparing Different Numerical Methods

Sep 2004

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2004ap%26ss.293..199m&link_type=abstract

Astrophysics and Space Science, v. 293, Issue 1, p. 199-207 (2004).

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Astrophysics

5

Numerical Methods, Jets

Scientific paper

High resolution Godunov-type methods have gained increasing popularity in the last decade due to their ability in modelling highly supersonic flows. Most of these shock-capturing schemes are based on the solution of the Riemann problem between discontinuous data at each cell’s interface. The purpose of this work is to investigate the role played by different Riemann solvers in the evolution of a supersonic jet. Morphology, dynamics, conservation properties and cocoon characteristics are examined for the four different cases presented.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Astrophysical Jet Simulations: Comparing Different Numerical Methods does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Astrophysical Jet Simulations: Comparing Different Numerical Methods, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Astrophysical Jet Simulations: Comparing Different Numerical Methods will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1061256