The inconsistency between proton charge exchange and the observed ring current decay

Other

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

7

Charge Exchange, Hydrogen, Magnetic Storms, Protons, Ring Currents, Angular Distribution, Gas Density, Helium Ions, Pitch (Inclination)

Scientific paper

The equatorial pitch-angle distributions of ring-current ions observed during a storm recovery phase at L values between 3 and 4 are compared with the pitch-angle distributions predicted by proton charge exchange with neutral hydrogen. Large disagreements are found, and three alternative explanations are explored. (1) A strong proton source acts to mask the effects of charge exchange. It is believed that the required strong continual source with a unique pitch-angle and energy dependence is unrealistic at these low L values. (2) Presently accepted neutral hydrogen density models have densities well over an order of magnitude too large for a storm recovery phase. No evidence is known to support the required large errors in the densities. (3) The ring current at particle energies not exceeding 50 keV was dominated by some ion species other than protons during the storm recovery phase. Such ions must have much longer lifetimes for charge exchange with hydrogen than do protons. This alternative is strongly favored, with He(+) being an attractive candidate.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

The inconsistency between proton charge exchange and the observed ring current decay does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with The inconsistency between proton charge exchange and the observed ring current decay, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The inconsistency between proton charge exchange and the observed ring current decay will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1050768

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.