Determining Extra-solar Planetary Orbits: Is Distinguishability Necessary?

Mathematics – Probability

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

Previous work on determining orbits of extra-solar planets included the assumption that the exo-solar system contained only one planet. In such cases, there was no ambiguity about the identity of the detected planet and a unique probability distribution for its orbit could be produced. However, planet detection systems that can observe large fractions of the extra-solar system may detect more than one planet on a given observation. This complicates the task of developing sets of possible orbits for these planets using a probabilistic method, as this approach requires an unambiguous observation history of detection times and positions associated with each planet. This paper answers the question, "Is distinguishability necessary to characterize the orbits of an extra-solar planetary system in a few observations?” We discuss the viability of various strategies, including a brute force solution and a more elegant Bayesian-inspired approach.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Determining Extra-solar Planetary Orbits: Is Distinguishability Necessary? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Determining Extra-solar Planetary Orbits: Is Distinguishability Necessary?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Determining Extra-solar Planetary Orbits: Is Distinguishability Necessary? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1028315

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.