Normalized power spectral densities of two X-ray components from GS 1124-683

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

55

Accretion Disks, Black Holes (Astronomy), Power Spectra, Stellar Mass Accretion, Stellar Spectra, X Ray Astronomy, X Ray Binaries, Black Body Radiation, Ginga Satellite, Radiation Counters, Spaceborne Astronomy, Spectral Energy Distribution, X Rays

Scientific paper

Time varitations of X-rays from the black hole candidate GS 1124-683 are investigated. In the high state, X-rays consist of two energy spectral components, i.e., a power-law component and a disk blackbody component. Power spectral densities (PSDs) of these two energy spectral components have characteristic shapes. The PSD of the power-law energy spectral component has a flat top (FT noise function) at frequencies less than about 2 Hz, and the PSD of the disk blackbody component has a power-law shape (PL noise function). The FT noise functions normalized by the power-law energy spectral component (the normalized FT noise function) are almost the same in cases where the photon counts in the power-law energy spectral component are larger than about 20% of the total photon counts; however, there are a few exceptions. The PL noise functions normalized by the disk blackbody component (the normalized PL noise function) are also almost the same when the photon counts in the power-law component are less than about 10%. However, the normalized PL noise functions have a tendency to increase with the power-law component, when the photon counts in the power-law component are larger than about 10%. This shows that time variations of the disk blackbody component have some relation to those of the power-law energy spectral component. In the high-to-low transition state, the normalized PSD (NPSD) of the power-law energy spectral component (the normalized FT noise function) is 4 times larger than the value in the high state, although the energy spectrum of this component is the same as that in the high state. In the low state, the X-rays consist of mainly a power-law energy spectral component and this component has a harder spectrum than the power-law energy spectral component in the high state. Moreover, the NPSD of X-rays in the low state has also a flat top at frequencies less than about 0.1 Hz and has larger absolute values than those of the normalized FT noise function of the power-law energy spectral component in the high state. As the phase legs between time variations of different energy X-rays are also different in these two states, the power-law energy spectral components in the high and the low state should have different production processes. Models that produce these energy spectral components are discussed.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Normalized power spectral densities of two X-ray components from GS 1124-683 does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Normalized power spectral densities of two X-ray components from GS 1124-683, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Normalized power spectral densities of two X-ray components from GS 1124-683 will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1021989

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.