HST observations of Kuiper Belt binaries

Other

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

6

Scientific paper

We report preliminary results from a Hubble Space Telescope (HST) program designed to characterize the orbital and physical properties of six confirmed KBO binaries [Margot et al. 2003]. Our results show that KBOs in our sample have much smaller sizes and larger albedos than expected, possibly requiring continuous collisional resurfacing and implying a Kuiper Belt that is less massive than previously assumed.
Table 1 describes a subset of four KBO binaries that can be clearly resolved only with HST (1999 TC36, 1998 SM165, 2001 QC298, 1997 CQ29). The orbital period P and semi-major axis a yield the total mass of the binary M. Uncertainties listed are three times the formal errors of the fit or 1%, whichever is greater. The primary to secondary radius ratio Rp/R_s is based on flux measurements in HST's F606W filter. We used the absolute magnitudes as reported by JPL's Horizons system, assumed that binary components have identical albedos and densities, and derived the densities corresponding to geometric albedos of 5%, 10%, and 20%. Most KBOs in our sample must have albedos in excess of the radiometric average of 8% [Altenhoff et al., 2004] otherwise their density would be implausibly low. For unit density, the primary radii/geometric albedos are (147 km, 23%), (116 km, 15%), (117 km, 7.6%), and (42 km, 41%). Detection of such small KBOs in the IR/mm is challenging.
\begin{tabular}[h]{rrrrrrrr} & P [days] & a [km] & M [1018 kg]& (Rp)/(R_s) & ρ 5 & ρ 10 & ρ 20
TC& 50.38 ± 0.5 & 7640 ± 460 & 13.9 ± 2.5 & 2.7 & 0.1 & 0.3 & 0.8
SM& 130.1 ± 1 & 11310 ± 110 & 6.78 ± 0.24 & 3.0 & 0.2 & 0.5 & 1.5
QC& 19.23 ± 0.2 & 3690 ± 70 & 10.8 ± 0.7 & 1.2 & 0.5 & 1.5 & 4.3
CQ& 309.2 ± 3 & 8320 ± 240 & 0.48 ± 0.04 & 1.2 & - & 0.1 & 0.3
References
Margot, Brown, Trujillo, Sari, HST General Observer Prgm 9746, 2003.
Altenhoff, Bertoldi, Menten, A&A 415, 2004.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

HST observations of Kuiper Belt binaries does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with HST observations of Kuiper Belt binaries, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and HST observations of Kuiper Belt binaries will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1012794

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.