Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

[
0.00
] – not rated yet
Voters
0
Comments 0

2003-04-10

Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 346 (2003) 47-57

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Astrophysics

11 pages, 23 figs, matches version accepted for publication in MNRAS. Additional tests with 2000 more simulations presented, i

Scientific paper

10.1046/j.1365-2966.2003.07067.x

Large-scale modes in the temperature anisotropy power spectrum C_l measured by the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP), seem to have lower amplitudes (C_2, C_3 and C_4) than that expected in the so called concordance LCDM model. In particular, the quadrupole C_2 is reported to have a smaller value than allowed by cosmic variance. This has been interpreted as a possible indication of new physics. In this paper we re-analyse the WMAP data using the 2-point angular correlation and its higher-order moments. This method, which requires a full covariance analysis, is more direct and provides better sampling of the largest modes than the standard harmonic decomposition. We show that the WMAP data is in good agreement (~ 30% probability) with a LCDM model when the WMAP data is considered as a particular realization drawn from a set of realistic LCDM simulations with the corresponding covariance. This is also true for the higher-order moments, shown here up to 6th order, which are consistent with the Gaussian hypothesis. The sky mask plays a major role in assessing the significance of these agreements. We recover the best fit model for the low-order multipoles based on the 2-point correlation with different assumptions for the covariance. Assuming that the observations are a fair sample of the true model, we find C_2 = 123 +/- 233, C_3= 217 +/- 241 and C_4 = 212 +/- 162 (in mu K^2). The errors increase by about a factor of 5 if we assume the \lcdm model. If we exclude the Galactic plane |b|<30 from our analysis, we recover very similar values within the errors (ie C_2=172, C_3= 89, C_4=129). This indicates that the Galactic plane is not responsible for the lack of large-scale power in the WMAP data.

**Gaztanaga Enrique**

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientist

**Hughes David H.**

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientist

**Montana Alfredo**

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics

Scientist

**Multamaki Tuomas**

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientist

**Wagg Jeff**

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics

Scientist

No associations

LandOfFree

If you have personal experience with

2-point anisotropies in WMAP and the Cosmic Quadrupoledoes not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.2-point anisotropies in WMAP and the Cosmic Quadrupole, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and 2-point anisotropies in WMAP and the Cosmic Quadrupole will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-273670

Use Google custom search:

All data on this website is collected from public sources.
Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.